Review



opengl graphic library  (MathWorks Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol MathWorks Inc is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    MathWorks Inc opengl graphic library
    Opengl Graphic Library, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/opengl graphic library/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    opengl graphic library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    90
    Borland Software opengl graphics library
    Opengl Graphics Library, supplied by Borland Software, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/opengl graphics library/product/Borland Software
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    opengl graphics library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc opengl graphic library
    Opengl Graphic Library, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/opengl graphic library/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    opengl graphic library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Silicon Graphics International Corp opengl graphic library
    Opengl Graphic Library, supplied by Silicon Graphics International Corp, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/opengl graphic library/product/Silicon Graphics International Corp
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    opengl graphic library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Philips Healthcare opengl graphics library 224
    Opengl Graphics Library 224, supplied by Philips Healthcare, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/opengl graphics library 224/product/Philips Healthcare
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    opengl graphics library 224 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc opengl graphics library of
    Opengl Graphics Library Of, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/opengl graphics library of/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    opengl graphics library of - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc graphics library opengl
    Plotted here is cycle number versus time, in milliseconds, on our test system (see Methods for specifications). There is a linear relationship between these variables, demonstrating roughly equal time intervals between samples. The one exception to this linearity occurs at the time of the first call for a control-screen update (the issuing of a “drawnow” command at 50 ms for the blue line and 100 ms for the red line); at that time, a gap of approximately 23 milliseconds was measured, meaning the software was blind to changes in the behavioral signal during this time. Importantly, no further such gaps are seen afterward, despite continued calls for updating the control screen at regular 50 or 100 ms intervals. Note that the actual screen update is not expected to occur at these times because of the slower refresh rate (60 Hz) and potential delays within <t>OpenGL</t> (the graphics library used <t>by</t> <t>Matlab).</t> Unlike the subject’s display, the experimenter’s display is low-priority (all that is required is a subjective sense of smooth motion), so these delays were not considered problematic. In contrast to what is depicted here, within our software, this first update is called in the first cycle, thereby fixing the expected “blind” interval to the very beginning of the behavioral tracking period. Note also that there is a slight difference in slope between the 50 and 100 ms conditions, reflecting fewer cycles executed in the former case. This likely reflects added background cost when there is an increased frequency of control screen updates (here, this cost is only on the order of 2 to 3 percent).
    Graphics Library Opengl, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/graphics library opengl/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    graphics library opengl - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MathWorks Inc opengl graphics library
    Plotted here is cycle number versus time, in milliseconds, on our test system (see Methods for specifications). There is a linear relationship between these variables, demonstrating roughly equal time intervals between samples. The one exception to this linearity occurs at the time of the first call for a control-screen update (the issuing of a “drawnow” command at 50 ms for the blue line and 100 ms for the red line); at that time, a gap of approximately 23 milliseconds was measured, meaning the software was blind to changes in the behavioral signal during this time. Importantly, no further such gaps are seen afterward, despite continued calls for updating the control screen at regular 50 or 100 ms intervals. Note that the actual screen update is not expected to occur at these times because of the slower refresh rate (60 Hz) and potential delays within <t>OpenGL</t> (the graphics library used <t>by</t> <t>Matlab).</t> Unlike the subject’s display, the experimenter’s display is low-priority (all that is required is a subjective sense of smooth motion), so these delays were not considered problematic. In contrast to what is depicted here, within our software, this first update is called in the first cycle, thereby fixing the expected “blind” interval to the very beginning of the behavioral tracking period. Note also that there is a slight difference in slope between the 50 and 100 ms conditions, reflecting fewer cycles executed in the former case. This likely reflects added background cost when there is an increased frequency of control screen updates (here, this cost is only on the order of 2 to 3 percent).
    Opengl Graphics Library, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/opengl graphics library/product/MathWorks Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    opengl graphics library - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Solaris Chem Inc opengl graphics library version 1.2.1
    Plotted here is cycle number versus time, in milliseconds, on our test system (see Methods for specifications). There is a linear relationship between these variables, demonstrating roughly equal time intervals between samples. The one exception to this linearity occurs at the time of the first call for a control-screen update (the issuing of a “drawnow” command at 50 ms for the blue line and 100 ms for the red line); at that time, a gap of approximately 23 milliseconds was measured, meaning the software was blind to changes in the behavioral signal during this time. Importantly, no further such gaps are seen afterward, despite continued calls for updating the control screen at regular 50 or 100 ms intervals. Note that the actual screen update is not expected to occur at these times because of the slower refresh rate (60 Hz) and potential delays within <t>OpenGL</t> (the graphics library used <t>by</t> <t>Matlab).</t> Unlike the subject’s display, the experimenter’s display is low-priority (all that is required is a subjective sense of smooth motion), so these delays were not considered problematic. In contrast to what is depicted here, within our software, this first update is called in the first cycle, thereby fixing the expected “blind” interval to the very beginning of the behavioral tracking period. Note also that there is a slight difference in slope between the 50 and 100 ms conditions, reflecting fewer cycles executed in the former case. This likely reflects added background cost when there is an increased frequency of control screen updates (here, this cost is only on the order of 2 to 3 percent).
    Opengl Graphics Library Version 1.2.1, supplied by Solaris Chem Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/opengl graphics library version 1.2.1/product/Solaris Chem Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    opengl graphics library version 1.2.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Plotted here is cycle number versus time, in milliseconds, on our test system (see Methods for specifications). There is a linear relationship between these variables, demonstrating roughly equal time intervals between samples. The one exception to this linearity occurs at the time of the first call for a control-screen update (the issuing of a “drawnow” command at 50 ms for the blue line and 100 ms for the red line); at that time, a gap of approximately 23 milliseconds was measured, meaning the software was blind to changes in the behavioral signal during this time. Importantly, no further such gaps are seen afterward, despite continued calls for updating the control screen at regular 50 or 100 ms intervals. Note that the actual screen update is not expected to occur at these times because of the slower refresh rate (60 Hz) and potential delays within OpenGL (the graphics library used by Matlab). Unlike the subject’s display, the experimenter’s display is low-priority (all that is required is a subjective sense of smooth motion), so these delays were not considered problematic. In contrast to what is depicted here, within our software, this first update is called in the first cycle, thereby fixing the expected “blind” interval to the very beginning of the behavioral tracking period. Note also that there is a slight difference in slope between the 50 and 100 ms conditions, reflecting fewer cycles executed in the former case. This likely reflects added background cost when there is an increased frequency of control screen updates (here, this cost is only on the order of 2 to 3 percent).

    Journal:

    Article Title: Achieving behavioral control with millisecond resolution in a high-level programming environment

    doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.06.003

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Plotted here is cycle number versus time, in milliseconds, on our test system (see Methods for specifications). There is a linear relationship between these variables, demonstrating roughly equal time intervals between samples. The one exception to this linearity occurs at the time of the first call for a control-screen update (the issuing of a “drawnow” command at 50 ms for the blue line and 100 ms for the red line); at that time, a gap of approximately 23 milliseconds was measured, meaning the software was blind to changes in the behavioral signal during this time. Importantly, no further such gaps are seen afterward, despite continued calls for updating the control screen at regular 50 or 100 ms intervals. Note that the actual screen update is not expected to occur at these times because of the slower refresh rate (60 Hz) and potential delays within OpenGL (the graphics library used by Matlab). Unlike the subject’s display, the experimenter’s display is low-priority (all that is required is a subjective sense of smooth motion), so these delays were not considered problematic. In contrast to what is depicted here, within our software, this first update is called in the first cycle, thereby fixing the expected “blind” interval to the very beginning of the behavioral tracking period. Note also that there is a slight difference in slope between the 50 and 100 ms conditions, reflecting fewer cycles executed in the former case. This likely reflects added background cost when there is an increased frequency of control screen updates (here, this cost is only on the order of 2 to 3 percent).

    Article Snippet: Thus, a screen update resulting from the “drawnow” command would appear at some later time, as allowed by OpenGL (the graphics library used by Matlab) and the screen refresh rate.

    Techniques: Control, Software